Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Position matrix

Crime policy & punishment — how parliament voted 2025–2026

Curated selection and our editorial directional classification. Only substantiated decision points are scored; context rows are not position evidence. This does not establish an individual member’s intention.

Party positions

For tougher direction in selection

Score +6 · 6/8 votes counted

For tougher direction in selection

Score +6 · 6/8 votes counted

For tougher direction in selection

Score +6 · 6/8 votes counted

For tougher direction in selection

Score +6 · 6/8 votes counted

For tougher direction in selection

Score +4 · 6/8 votes counted

Mostly for tougher direction

Score +2 · 6/8 votes counted

Mostly for tougher direction

Score +1 · 5/8 votes counted

Against tougher direction in selection

Score -4 · 6/8 votes counted

Against tougher direction in selectionMostly against tougher directionMixedMostly for tougher directionFor tougher direction in selection

Key votes

Abuse of public office

2025/26:JuU40 · point 2 · Point 2: new offence of abuse of public office, not the entire public-official liability package.

Date
2026-06-15
For tougher direction in selection =
Ja
S
SNej
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CNej
V
VNej
KD
KDJa
MP
MPNej
L
LJa

Criminalisation of escape

2025/26:JuU38 · point 1 · Point 1: criminalisation of escape, not a general repeat-offender sanction.

Date
2026-06-03
For tougher direction in selection =
Ja
S
SJa
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CJa
V
VJa
KD
KDJa
MP
MPNej
L
LJa

Police real-time AI facial recognition

2025/26:JuU28 · point 1 · Expanded surveillance powers for police.

Date
2026-05-26
For tougher direction in selection =
Ja
S
SJa
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CNej
V
VJa
KD
KDJa
MP
MPJa
L
LJa

Conversion practices

2025/26:JuU39 · point 3 · Context row: the voted point is not the main legislative decision and is excluded from the directional score.

Date
2026-05-20
For tougher direction in selection =
Not classified
S
SNej
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CNej
V
VNej
KD
KDJa
MP
MPNej
L
LJa

Competence requirements and appointment of public counsel

2025/26:JuU6 · point 2 · Context row: the voted point is not the main legislative decision and is excluded from the directional score.

Date
2025-11-26
For tougher direction in selection =
Not classified
S
SJa
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CJa
V
VJa
KD
KDJa
MP
MPNej
L
LJa

Source & method

For each key vote we mark which vote reflects a tougher stance (higher penalties, expanded enforcement powers, more tools for law enforcement) and which reflects a more lenient stance. The classification is the site's own editorial assessment of the proposal's direction based on the committee report — not an official verdict. Score: +1 for a Yes/No vote in the marked direction, −1 for the opposite vote; abstentions and missing votes are excluded. Context rows without a substantiated direction are excluded. Normalised value = score/counted votes. Band boundaries: −0.6; −0.2; 0.2; 0.6. At least four counted votes are required for a visible position band. Opposing a tightening proposal does not mean supporting reductions. The selection is not a party manifesto, all policy or an individual member’s intention.

Source: data.riksdagen.se (vote list, CC0). Fetched: 11/10/2026.