Frequently asked questions
Questions and limitations
The most common questions about what the net fiscal contribution calculations actually include — and what they do not capture. The answers are neutral and refer directly to Ruist 2018 and KI 2025.
Counterarguments · answered honestly
Common objections
The most common objections to this site's conclusions — and how we answer them. Where the objection has a point, we say so. Where it rests on a misunderstanding, we explain why.
Isn't labour migration positive for Sweden?
Yes, generally speaking. Both Ruist 2018 and NIER 2025 show that labour migrants contribute positively to public finances during their working years. The site therefore separates refugee and family migration (where the net position is clearly negative) from labour migration (where it is positive or close to zero). It is the relative size of the groups that drives the overall picture — not a claim that all immigration is costly.
Are you ignoring the second generation?
Partly, yes. NIER's data classifies children of two foreign-born parents as native-born — which means the second generation's net contribution is hidden inside the 'native-born' figure. The National Council for Crime Prevention (2021:9) nevertheless shows that the second generation has a higher crime risk than both the foreign-born and native-born with two native-born parents. We state this openly on /en/methodology and /en/second-generation.
Aren't the figures outdated — are you using 2015 data?
No. NIER Special Study 117 was published in June 2025 and covers 1983–2022 using Swedish register data. Ruist 2018:3 dates from 2018 but rests on a lifetime model whose results have been confirmed by several later reviews (the Fiscal Policy Council, SOU 2017:12, NOU 2017:2). The order of magnitude is robust over time.
Isn't this racist or xenophobic?
No. All figures come from Swedish public authorities — the National Institute of Economic Research, ESO/Ministry of Finance, the National Council for Crime Prevention, Statistics Sweden and the National Audit Office. Reporting the fiscal costs behind a democratically decided budget is not a moral judgement about individuals. The site takes no position on people's worth, culture or religion — only on what the public finances show.
Do you count immigrants' contribution to GDP, consumption and entrepreneurship?
Indirectly, yes. Taxes and employer contributions reflect paid work and entrepreneurship. VAT reflects consumption. What is not captured is dynamic effects on native-born wages and employment, and the long-run spillovers of entrepreneurship. The research is divided on these effects, and neither Ruist nor NIER attempts to quantify them.
What about cultural enrichment and the value of diversity?
That cannot be quantified in kronor — and the site does not try. We measure one thing: direct fiscal inflows and outflows. That is a limited but important measure for understanding the sustainability of the public budget. Other values — cultural, social, moral — are for each reader to weigh.
Isn't demography the real problem — that Sweden is ageing?
It is part of the picture, but not all of it. NIER shows that the net contribution of the native-born deteriorates as the population ages (more care and pensions, less work). Immigration can in theory counteract this — but only if those who arrive work to a sufficient degree. For labour migrants that holds; for refugee migration with current integration outcomes it does not.
Don't immigrants find work eventually — doesn't it just take time?
Partly. Employment rises clearly with time in the country, but levels off well below the native-born rate — especially for women from the Middle East and Africa. NIER's lifecycle NPV shows that even assuming gradual improvement, the net contribution remains negative. It is this long plateau that drives Ruist's SEK 74,000 per year.
Frequently asked questions about the method
Is family reunification included?
Yes. Ruist's 2018 report reports refugees including their family members as a single group. The same applies to the National Institute of Economic Research (NIER) refugee category in 2025. Family members of labour migrants are generally closer to other foreign-born groups in net contribution.
Is crime included?
No, not in any substantial way. Neither Ruist 2018 nor NIER 2025 includes a separate item for police, the justice system, corrections or indirect costs of crime linked to origin. The direct costs of the justice system are part of general public expenditure but are not allocated specifically between groups.
Are Swedish-language tuition, reception housing, dental care and unemployment insurance included?
Yes, direct public expenditure is largely included — introduction benefit, social assistance, housing allowance, healthcare, schooling, Swedish-language tuition, care services, pensions and more. The items are allocated at individual level using register data. This is what makes the refugee group clearly negative in both studies.
Why can municipalities experience it differently?
Many of the heaviest costs (social assistance, schooling, social services, reception) fall on the municipalities, while large revenues (central income tax, VAT, employer contributions) go to the state. The national aggregate hides this imbalance — a municipality with a high share of newly arrived residents can have a strongly negative net position even when the country as a whole looks more balanced.
What is the difference between Ruist 2018 and NIER 2025?
Ruist 2018 focuses specifically on the refugee group and calculates over a lifetime horizon (SEK 74,000 per year in average net cost per refugee, range SEK 53,000–94,000). NIER 2025 covers all foreign-born residents from 1983 to 2022 and reports both annual cross-sections and lifecycle NPV. The studies use different boundaries and different base years — they do not contradict each other, they complement each other.
Why do you highlight Ruist's SEK 74,000 as the headline figure?
A lifetime average is more stable than a single year's cross-section. NIER's +SEK 6bn for 2022 is affected by the fact that refugee inflows were historically low that year and the labour market strong — an unusually favourable year. Ruist's SEK 74,000 per year describes the pattern across an entire life, from settlement to retirement.
What is not included in the analyses?
Indirect effects on wages and employment among the native-born, crime, the second generation, dynamic effects on the labour and housing markets, and long-term impact on public investment. See the summary below.
Frequently asked questions about the site
Where does the statistics come from?
All figures come from public primary sources: government agencies (Statistics Sweden, the National Council for Crime Prevention, the Migration Agency, the National Agency for Education, the National Board of Health and Welfare, the Police, the Election Authority, the National Institute of Economic Research, ESO, the National Audit Office), research institutes and international bodies (OECD, Eurostat, IMF, World Bank). Every figure links directly to its source. See /en/sources for the full list.
How often is the site updated?
Every page shows 'Last updated' in its header. Data is updated when the primary source publishes new figures — some series monthly (reported crime), others annually (Statistics Sweden register data), a few with longer lags (lifetime studies). The full history is available at /en/changelog.
Why do figures differ between agencies?
Different agencies measure different things using different definitions and time windows. 'Foreign-born' at Statistics Sweden is not the same as 'foreign background' at the National Council for Crime Prevention. 'Reported offences' is not the same as 'persons convicted'. We always state which definition applies to each figure. See /en/definitions.
What is an own calculation?
When we combine several primary sources, run cohort simulations or projections, we do the calculation ourselves. Such figures are always labelled 'own calculation' with the formula, assumptions and sensitivity analysis stated — and the underlying raw data always comes from the primary source.
Why is some data missing?
Some figures are not measured at all in official statistics (for example political affiliation by immigrant group), others are confidential at individual level, and some series have been discontinued (Statistics Sweden stopped publishing certain breakdowns in 2004). When data is missing, we say so.
What does modelling mean?
A model is a simplification of reality built on assumptions. When we use a model (for example Ruist's lifetime net position, the NIER macro model) we show which assumptions apply, the range the outcome produces and what happens if the assumptions change. Models do not deliver 'the truth' — they deliver scenarios.
How do projections work?
A projection extrapolates today's data given certain assumptions about the future (fertility, migration, employment). Statistics Sweden's population projection is the standard example. We always use official projections where they exist and state clearly when something is extrapolated.
How do I report an error?
Via /en/contact. All external contact goes through a public AnonAddy alias. State the page, the exact wording and the primary source you believe is more accurate. Confirmed errors are corrected openly and logged in /en/changelog.
How do I cite material?
We have a dedicated page: /en/cite. APA, Harvard, simple web citation and BibTeX. Citing, referencing and linking are always welcome. Sverigefakta's own texts and charts are not offered under a general Creative Commons licence — larger republication or commercial use requires written permission. Underlying source data remains subject to each source's own terms.
May I use the charts?
Yes, in editorial and academic contexts to the extent permitted by law. Use the caption: 'Source: sverigefakta.com, based on [primary source].' If the chart shows raw primary data without processing, credit the primary source first. Commercial use requires written permission — please contact us.
Important context
What is not included in the figures?
NIER 2025 and Ruist 2018 measure direct fiscal inflows and outflows. Several items that research and public debate treat as relevant are not quantified in the underlying studies. The direction of the net effect varies between items — see each card below.
Crime and the justice system
Police, prosecutors, courts, corrections and victim costs are not allocated by group in either NIER or Ruist. Recurring reports from the National Council for Crime Prevention show that the foreign-born are overrepresented as suspects for several offence types — but no fiscal cost allocation by country of birth exists in the underlying studies.
Second generation
Children of foreign-born parents count as native-born in NIER's register data. Their net contribution — positive or negative — does not appear in the 'foreign-born' figure but is hidden in the reference group.
Effects on native-born wages and employment
Labour market competition, possible wage effects and changes in native-born employment are not included. These are dynamic effects; the NIER and Ruist analyses are static.
Housing market and overcrowding
Housing allowance is included, but not indirect costs of residential segregation, rent regulation, public housing investment or the health and schooling effects of overcrowding.
Schools, segregation and learning outcomes
The school cost per pupil is included, but not composition effects on results, teacher density or long-run effects on human capital across the whole cohort.
Shadow economy and undeclared work
Unregistered income and undeclared work are by definition absent from register data. The effect can run in both directions, but the net effect is not quantified.
Growth, innovation and entrepreneurship
Positive spillovers to GDP growth, business formation and innovation are not included — nor are any negative effects on productivity.
Defence, security and preparedness
Some public expenditure (defence, general administration) is treated as a collective good and is not allocated per individual.
Sources for individual items are given in the methodology section. sverigefakta.com makes no estimates of the size of these items — we only flag that they are not part of the +SEK 6bn figure for 2022.
More resources: all sources · method & principles · how to cite this site · report an error