Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Position matrix

Integration & welfare conditionality — how parliament voted 2025–2026

Curated selection and our editorial directional classification. Only substantiated decision points are scored; context rows are not position evidence. This does not establish an individual member’s intention.

Party positions

Insufficient evidence

Score +3 · 3/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score +3 · 3/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score +3 · 3/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score +3 · 3/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score +1 · 1/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score +3 · 3/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score -1 · 3/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Insufficient evidence

Score -1 · 1/5 votes counted — below the display threshold (4); not a certainty guarantee

Strongly lower requirementsLower requirementsMixedRaise requirementsStrongly raise requirements

Key votes

Reformed welfare — benefit cap

2025/26:SoU30 · point 1 · Introduces a cap on welfare benefits.

Date
2026-05-26
Strongly raise requirements =
Ja
S
SNej
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CJa
V
VAvstår
KD
KDJa
MP
MPAvstår
L
LJa

Funding of the reform

2025/26:SoU26 · point 2 · Context row: the voted point is not the main legislative decision and is excluded from the directional score.

Date
2026-04-01
Strongly raise requirements =
Not classified
S
SJa
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CJa
V
VNej
KD
KDJa
MP
MPAvstår
L
LJa

SFI and vocational education

2025/26:UbU4 · point 3 · Context row: the voted point is not the main legislative decision and is excluded from the directional score.

Date
2025-11-19
Strongly raise requirements =
Not classified
S
SNej
M
MJa
SD
SDJa
C
CJa
V
VNej
KD
KDJa
MP
MPNej
L
LJa

Source & method

Each key vote is marked with which vote reflects stricter integration/welfare conditions (language/activity requirements, benefit caps) and which reflects a more unconditional stance. Based on the content of the bill itself. Score: +1 for a Yes/No vote in the marked direction, −1 for the opposite vote; abstentions and missing votes are excluded. Context rows without a substantiated direction are excluded. Normalised value = score/counted votes. Band boundaries: −0.6; −0.2; 0.2; 0.6. At least four counted votes are required for a visible position band. Opposing a tightening proposal does not mean supporting reductions. The selection is not a party manifesto, all policy or an individual member’s intention.

Source: data.riksdagen.se (vote list, CC0). Fetched: 11/10/2026.