Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA.com
Vulnerable areas — the list isn't shrinking
What happened to Sweden?

Vulnerable areas

Vulnerable areas — the list isn't shrinking

The Swedish Police have published a list of vulnerable areas since 2015. Despite major operations the figure has stayed around 60. Denmark has halved its equivalent list over the same period. At the same time, the 2025 assessment reports a modest positive shift in several areas — drug dealing has moved off the streets and attacks on officers are declining.

Memory

Sweden: 53 → 59 (+11 %) in ten years. Denmark: 25 → 12 (−52 %) over the same period.

2015

53

Swedish Police

2025

59

Swedish Police

The question this page answers

How has the number of vulnerable areas changed — and what does the change actually mean?

At a glance

Key figures — the most important numbers on this page

2015

53

Areas in the first assessment

2017–2023

61

Peak, three editions

2025

59

Areas in the 2025 assessment

2025

19

Of which 'especially vulnerable'

2015–2025

6

Editions (2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023, 2025)

2025

3 → 2

Categories — 'risk area' dropped

What does the data show?

Objective observations — not interpretations

  • Number of areas per category at each publication in 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 — not an annual measurement.
  • Which areas were added or removed between two editions.
  • Which areas moved category between two editions (e.g. from 'especially vulnerable' to 'vulnerable').
  • That the total (55–61 areas) has been broadly flat since 2017 — despite substantial police operations.
  • That Denmark's comparable list (the 'parallelsamfundslisten' under the housing act) has fallen from about 25 (2015) to 12 (2025).
  • That a change in the list cannot alone be read as a change in the underlying situation.

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Publication year vs calendar year
The assessment is published every other year (2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023, 2025). Between publications there is no official reclassification. An annual line in a chart therefore represents publication moments, not annual measurements.Source: Swedish Police — 2023/2025 assessment (method).
Category change
A change of an area's category in a new edition compared with the previous one — e.g. from 'especially vulnerable' to 'vulnerable' or vice versa. May reflect an actual change, a geographic redefinition or adjusted assessment criteria.Source: Swedish Police — assessment series.
Added area
An area classified for the first time in a new edition. Does not necessarily mean the situation is new — it may also mean that the area's boundaries have been adjusted or that the police have revised an earlier judgement.Source: Swedish Police — 2023/2025 assessments.
Removed area
A previously classified area that no longer appears in a new edition. May be due to actual improvement, geographic redefinition, splitting or merging with another area, or adjusted assessment criteria.Source: Swedish Police — 2023/2025 assessments.
Geographic delineation
An area in the assessment consists of one or more SCB key-code zones (NYKO) or equivalents. Changed boundaries between publications mean that the comparison does not always cover exactly the same footprint.Source: Swedish Police — assessment series; SCB DeSO/NYKO.
Method change
A change in definitions, categories, assessment criteria, geographic delineation or data collection. The Swedish Police have adjusted criteria on several occasions (2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2025). The largest is the removal of the 'risk area' category in 2025.Source: Swedish Police — 2025 assessment (method).
Comparable time series
A series in which each data point is measured with the same method and same definitions. After the 2025 edition, the 'areas per category' series is not strictly comparable over the full 2015–2025 period — a strictly comparable series exists only from 2025 onward.Source: Swedish Police — 2025 assessment (method).
Vulnerable and especially vulnerable (2025)
The two categories that apply from the 2025 assessment. 'Vulnerable' corresponds to the earlier 'vulnerable' and 'risk area'; 'especially vulnerable' has the same meaning as in previous editions. The 'risk area' category no longer exists.Source: Swedish Police — 2025 assessment.

How to read this

Data in context

How to read this

The charts below show what the numbers say — not an interpretation. Where data point in different directions (e.g. stable trust but rising insecurity) we show both series rather than pick a narrative.

Polismyndighetens kategoriserade utsatta områden, 2015–2025
53
61
60
61
59
59*
201520172019202120232025
  • 2025*varav 19 särskilt utsatta

The Nordics — same metric

Antal officiellt kategoriserade utsatta/ghetto-områden — Sverige vs Danmark (lista) vs Norge/Finland (saknas)

2015–2025 · index · Norden

Antal officiellt kategoriserade utsatta/ghetto-områden — Sverige vs Danmark (lista) vs Norge/Finland (saknas) · index · 2015–2025 · Norden
ÅrNorgeDanmarkFinlandSverige
2 015025053
2 025012059

Source:

Övriga områden81 %Utsatta13 %Särskilt utsatta6 %
100 ≈ all areas in Sweden. 19 % fall into one of the police categories in 2024.

Human consequence

Persona

A community police officer in a particularly vulnerable area.

Then

  • A 'community team' meant a few officers on call.
  • Crime scenes were handled by individual patrols.
  • Witnesses called the police — and dared to testify.

Now

  • Permanent reinforcement, body armour standard.
  • Multiple patrols and ambulance escort required for callouts.
  • Witness interviews are done in protected channels; witness refusal is more common than in any other Nordic country.

How does it look in your municipality?

Every area sits inside a municipality. Open the municipality tool to see which municipalities have areas in the latest assessment and how the list has changed there.

Open the municipality tool →

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

6

reports & studies

2

primary datasets

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

From 53 areas in the first assessment in 2015 to 59 in the 2025 assessment — a total increase of about 11 %. The level has been flat around 55–61 areas since 2017. Denmark's comparable list has fallen from about 25 to 12 areas over the same period.

Logical next steps if you want to understand the background

2035

What would it take to follow Denmark — halving the list in a decade?

Sweden's trend has been flat since 2017. At Denmark's halving rate, Sweden's list would not reach 30 areas until well into the 2030s.

Sources for this page

The data comes from official primary sources.

Read the full investigation of how Sweden has changed.

Back to overview →