Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA.com

Compare municipalities

Select up to four municipalities and compare verified key figures on population, work, economy and tax, schools, housing, health and crime. Every metric is compared for the same period across all selected municipalities — otherwise it is not shown.

Last updated: View changelog

KumlaprofileLindesbergprofile

Overview

Kumla
County: Örebro län
Population 2024: 22,681
Full municipal profile
Lindesberg
County: Örebro län
Population 2024: 23,141
Full municipal profile

Quick comparison

Sverigefakta does not rank municipalities as good or bad. “Highest” and “Lowest” describe only the numeric value among the selected municipalities.

Population (31 Dec)
2024 · people

Kumla
22,681 peopleLowest
Lindesberg
23,141 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
36,509

Population change, 5 years
2024 · %

Kumla
4.3 %Highest
Lindesberg
-1.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
0.3

Municipal tax rate (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
21.5 %Lowest
Lindesberg
22.3 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
21.7

Median income, 20+
2024 · SEK

Kumla
354,400 SEKHighest
Lindesberg
328,000 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
345,416

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational upper secondary programmes (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
76.5 %Highest
Lindesberg
74.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
81.5

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 2), share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
12.3 %Lowest
Lindesberg
17.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
13.5

Life expectancy, women
2025 · years

Kumla
84.6 yearsHighest
Lindesberg
84.6 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
84.7

Reported violent offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
1,393.7 /100kHighest
Lindesberg
970.6 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
885.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Population (31 Dec) over time

2002–2024 · people · Municipalities

Verified time series for the selected municipalities, same definition and same years.

Population (31 Dec) over time: Kumla moves from 19,105 (2002) to 22,681 (2024) — up 3,576 people. Full values are available in the data table below (2002–2024, Municipalities).

Population (31 Dec) over time · people · 2002–2024 · Municipalities
YearKumlaLindesberg
2 00219 10523 492
2 00319 27923 442
2 00419 38323 300
2 00519 47323 228
2 00619 64323 074
2 00719 85223 104
2 00820 15723 099
2 00920 21423 029
2 01020 45623 034
2 01120 51023 108
2 01220 73822 979
2 01320 90423 176
2 01421 01623 269
2 01521 15423 562
2 01621 33423 744
2 01721 50623 613
2 01821 64023 575
2 01921 73823 588
2 02021 86223 658
2 02122 14423 601
2 02222 47923 435
2 02322 51623 292
2 02422 68123 141

Method: Only years where every selected municipality has a verified value are shown.

Source: SCB BE0101N1

Comparison by topic

Population

Annual population change
2024 · people

Kumla
165.0 peopleHighest
Lindesberg
-151.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
124.1

Population change, 10 years
2024 · %

Kumla
7.9 %Highest
Lindesberg
-0.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
4.3

Residents aged 0–19, share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
25.5 %Highest
Lindesberg
21.8 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
22.0

Residents aged 20–64, share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
54.0 %Highest
Lindesberg
51.4 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
52.6

Residents aged 65–79, share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
13.8 %Lowest
Lindesberg
18.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
17.6

Residents aged 80+, share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
6.6 %Lowest
Lindesberg
8.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
7.8

Deaths, number
2025 · people

Kumla
213.0 peopleLowest
Lindesberg
254.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
318.1

Births, number
2025 · people

Kumla
206.0 peopleHighest
Lindesberg
186.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
336.2

Demographic dependency ratio
2025 · ratio

Kumla
0.85 ratioLowest
Lindesberg
0.95 ratioHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.91

In-migration to the municipality
2025 · people

Kumla
1,286.0 peopleHighest
Lindesberg
1,028.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,132.5

Net domestic migration
2025 · people

Kumla
9.0 peopleHighest
Lindesberg
-55.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.1

Out-migration from the municipality
2025 · people

Kumla
1,291.0 peopleHighest
Lindesberg
1,083.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,091.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Work

Residents receiving social assistance during the year, share of population (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
1.9 %Lowest
Lindesberg
2.8 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.4

Employed refugees/family reunified 20–64, 4–6 years of residence, share (%)
2024 · %

Kumla
67.3 %Highest
Lindesberg
63.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
61.2

Households receiving social assistance, number
2025 · households

Kumla
253.0 householdsLowest
Lindesberg
368.0 householdsHighest
National (municipal mean)
522.6

Employment rate, foreign-born 20–64 (%)
2024 · %

Kumla
74.0 %Highest
Lindesberg
69.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
70.2

Residents aged 16–24 not in employment, education or training (%)
2024 · %

Kumla
6.3 %Lowest
Lindesberg
8.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
6.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Economy & tax

Net cost of elderly care, SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Kumla
13,985 SEK/residentLowest
Lindesberg
17,277 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
17,158

Net cost of social services (IFO), SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Kumla
3,972.5 SEK/residentLowest
Lindesberg
4,783.9 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
5,333.4

Net income as share of tax revenue & general grants (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
4.6 %Highest
Lindesberg
1.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
3.5

Tax base per resident (SEK)
2025 · SEK

Kumla
270,074 SEKHighest
Lindesberg
265,816 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
280,284

Equity ratio, municipality (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
64.0 %Highest
Lindesberg
34.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
40.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Schools

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational programmes, municipal schools (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
76.5 %Highest
Lindesberg
74.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
80.8

Year 9 pupils passing all subjects (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
65.2 %Highest
Lindesberg
56.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
67.9

Upper-secondary students graduating within 3 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
66.4 %Highest
Lindesberg
66.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
69.3

Upper-secondary students graduating within 4 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
77.1 %Highest
Lindesberg
71.5 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
73.5

Year 9 average merit rating, home municipality (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Kumla
215.0 pointsHighest
Lindesberg
190.0 pointsLowest
National (municipal mean)
218.3

Year 9 merit rating, municipality of location (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Kumla
211.6 pointsHighest
Lindesberg
188.0 pointsLowest
National (municipal mean)
217.0
Data points (observation IDs)

Housing

Completed dwellings
2025 · dwellings

Kumla
62.0 dwellingsHighest
Lindesberg
7.0 dwellingsLowest
National (municipal mean)
108.1

Rental dwellings, number per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Kumla
193.0 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Lindesberg
188.2 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
171.6

Completed detached houses per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Kumla
1.3 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Lindesberg
0.2 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.6

Apartment price, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Kumla
13,871 SEK/m²Highest
Lindesberg
8,571.0 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
17,205

House prices, detached houses, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Kumla
21,251 SEK/m²Highest
Lindesberg
11,653 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21,704

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 3), share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
36.5 %Lowest
Lindesberg
41.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
36.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Health

Life expectancy, men
2025 · years

Kumla
82.3 yearsHighest
Lindesberg
80.7 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
81.3

Residential elderly care users satisfied overall (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
84.5 %Highest
Lindesberg
71.7 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
78.1

Ongoing stress-related sick leave, annual average share of population (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
0.6 %Lowest
Lindesberg
0.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
0.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Crime

Reported offences against liberty and peace (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
935.0 /100kLowest
Lindesberg
1,222.0 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
1,418.9

Reported offences, total (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
9,795.8 /100kHighest
Lindesberg
8,610.1 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
9,856.9

Reported economic crime (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
1,658.4 /100kHighest
Lindesberg
1,421.3 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,075.2

Reported gross violation of a woman's integrity (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
0.0 /100kLowest
Lindesberg
13.0 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
8.4

Reported drug offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
1,914.2 /100kHighest
Lindesberg
1,031.3 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
825.5

Reported sexual offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kumla
141.1 /100kLowest
Lindesberg
182.0 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
187.2
Data points (observation IDs)

Politics

Assignments per elected municipal politician
2025 · assignments/politician

Kumla
2.1 assignments/politicianHighest
Lindesberg
2.0 assignments/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
1.8

Residents per elected municipal politician
2025 · residents/politician

Kumla
222.4 residents/politicianLowest
Lindesberg
226.9 residents/politicianHighest
National (municipal mean)
221.4

Elected municipal politicians part-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Kumla
2.9 %Highest
Lindesberg
1.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
2.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Calculated and specialised measures

The measures below are not official municipal observations in the same sense as the tables above. They are calculated by Sverigefakta or taken from situation reports and model estimates, and are therefore reported separately.

Estimated net cost per resident per year
Model estimate
Note: Model estimate = (received / 5) × Ruist's average annual net cost per person (SEK 74,000 in 2018 prices, inflation-adjusted) / population. It covers only the last five years of reception and is not official municipal accounting.

Kumla
-93 SEK
Lindesberg
-65 SEK
National
About the data. The comparison uses the municipal engine's verified time series — the same figures, definitions and sources as the municipal pages. For every metric we use the latest period in which all selected municipalities have a verified value. If no common period exists the metric is omitted entirely; nothing is imputed and years are never mixed within a row.

About the tool

Compare municipalities — method, units and sources

Choose up to four municipalities and see them side by side on the same indicator, the same year and the same unit. The national mean is shown as a reference. Shareable URL — the recipient opens the same comparison.

Method & limitations

  • All compared municipalities are shown for the same year per indicator. Where an indicator is missing '—' is displayed.
  • Units are fixed per row (percent, SEK, count per 1,000). Rows never mix units within the same column.
  • The national mean is the source's own national row (SCB / Kolada / Migrationsverket) — not an average of municipalities.
  • Ranking or best/worst colours are only used where the indicator has a clear direction (e.g. upper-secondary eligibility, higher is better).
  • Net cost is a model estimate: Ruist's 74,000 SEK/year × arrivals 2020–2024 / population. Not official municipal accounts.
  • The clear button resets selections. URL parameters make the comparison shareable.

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

2

reports & studies

6

primary datasets

All primary sources

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Per capita / per 1,000 / per 100,000
Normalising an absolute number by population size, so municipalities of different sizes can be compared. Shootings, for example, are usually reported per 100,000 inhabitants.
Median vs mean
The median is the middle value in a sorted series. The mean is the sum divided by the count and is much more sensitive to outliers. Incomes and wealth are therefore usually reported as medians.
Ranking & percentile
The ranking is the municipality's place in the sorted list of all 290 municipalities. The percentile is the share below the municipality — rank 29 of 290 ≈ the 90th percentile.Ties use shared ranking (e.g. two municipalities both at rank 10).

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

No — we cap at four. Beyond that the table becomes hard to read on mobile and colour coding loses its meaning. Use /en/comparisons for county-vs-county perspectives.