Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Compare municipalities

Select up to four municipalities and compare verified key figures on population, work, economy and tax, schools, housing, health and crime. Every metric is compared for the same period across all selected municipalities — otherwise it is not shown.

Last updated: View changelog

MullsjöprofileHaboprofile

Overview

Mullsjö
County: Jönköpings län
Population 2025: 7,539
Full municipal profile
Habo
County: Jönköpings län
Population 2025: 13,516
Full municipal profile

Quick comparison

Sverigefakta does not rank municipalities as good or bad. “Highest” and “Lowest” describe only the numeric value among the selected municipalities.

Population (31 Dec)
2025 · people

Mullsjö
7,539.0 peopleLowest
Habo
13,516 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 5 years
2025 · %

Mullsjö
2.1 %Lowest
Habo
7.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)

Municipal tax rate (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
22.3 %Highest
Habo
22.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21.7

Median income, 20+
2024 · SEK

Mullsjö
347,400 SEKLowest
Habo
385,500 SEKHighest
National (municipal mean)
345,416

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational upper secondary programmes (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
74.7 %Lowest
Habo
82.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
81.5

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 2), share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
8.9 %Lowest
Habo
11.3 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
13.5

Life expectancy, women
2025 · years

Mullsjö
84.1 yearsLowest
Habo
87.3 yearsHighest
National (municipal mean)
84.7

Reported violent offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
435.9 /100kHighest
Habo
378.2 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
885.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Population (31 Dec) over time

2002–2025 · people · Municipalities

Verified time series for the selected municipalities, same definition and same years.

Population (31 Dec) over time: Mullsjö moves from 7,124 (2002) to 7,539 (2025) — up 415 people. Full values are available in the data table below (2002–2025, Municipalities).

Population (31 Dec) over time · people · 2002–2025 · Municipalities
YearMullsjöHabo
2 0027 1249 584
2 0037 1299 568
2 0047 1019 758
2 0057 0879 842
2 0067 07510 122
2 0077 04610 375
2 0087 08610 526
2 0097 02710 674
2 0107 03310 741
2 0117 03410 828
2 0127 07010 879
2 0137 03910 975
2 0147 10911 110
2 0157 15711 314
2 0167 22611 586
2 0177 32811 845
2 0187 32412 140
2 0197 29012 433
2 0207 38512 589
2 0217 43012 810
2 0227 53213 128
2 0237 57713 275
2 0247 59413 456
2 0257 53913 516

Method: Only years where every selected municipality has a verified value are shown.

Source: SCB BE0101N1

Comparison by topic

Population

Annual population change
2025 · people

Mullsjö
-55.0 peopleLowest
Habo
60.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 10 years
2025 · %

Mullsjö
5.3 %Lowest
Habo
19.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)

Residents aged 0–19, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
24.4 %Lowest
Habo
29.9 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
22.0

Residents aged 20–64, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
50.9 %Lowest
Habo
51.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
52.6

Residents aged 65–79, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
17.1 %Highest
Habo
13.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
17.6

Residents aged 80+, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
7.5 %Highest
Habo
5.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
7.8

Deaths, number
2025 · people

Mullsjö
79.0 peopleLowest
Habo
92.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
318.1

Births, number
2025 · people

Mullsjö
65.0 peopleLowest
Habo
135.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
336.2

Demographic dependency ratio
2025 · ratio

Mullsjö
0.96 ratioHighest
Habo
0.94 ratioLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.91

In-migration to the municipality
2025 · people

Mullsjö
386.0 peopleLowest
Habo
547.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
2,132.5

Net domestic migration
2025 · people

Mullsjö
-32.0 peopleLowest
Habo
17.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.1

Out-migration from the municipality
2025 · people

Mullsjö
421.0 peopleLowest
Habo
540.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
2,091.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Work

Residents receiving social assistance during the year, share of population (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
2.7 %Highest
Habo
1.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
2.4

Households receiving social assistance, number
2025 · households

Mullsjö
133.0 householdsHighest
Habo
97.0 householdsLowest
National (municipal mean)
522.6

Employment rate, foreign-born 20–64 (%)
2024 · %

Mullsjö
73.2 %Lowest
Habo
74.3 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
70.2

Residents aged 16–24 not in employment, education or training (%)
2024 · %

Mullsjö
6.1 %Highest
Habo
5.5 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
6.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Economy & tax

Net cost of elderly care, SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Mullsjö
16,285 SEK/residentHighest
Habo
11,340 SEK/residentLowest
National (municipal mean)
17,158

Net cost of social services (IFO), SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Mullsjö
4,721.4 SEK/residentHighest
Habo
2,725.6 SEK/residentLowest
National (municipal mean)
5,333.4

Net income as share of tax revenue & general grants (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
0.9 %Lowest
Habo
4.8 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
3.5

Tax base per resident (SEK)
2025 · SEK

Mullsjö
262,403 SEKLowest
Habo
279,235 SEKHighest
National (municipal mean)
280,284

Equity ratio, municipality (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
19.6 %Lowest
Habo
47.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
40.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Schools

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational programmes, municipal schools (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
74.7 %Lowest
Habo
82.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
80.8

Year 9 pupils passing all subjects (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
61.3 %Lowest
Habo
71.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
67.9

Upper-secondary students graduating within 3 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
54.7 %Lowest
Habo
76.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
69.3

Upper-secondary students graduating within 4 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
65.5 %Lowest
Habo
78.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
73.5

Year 9 average merit rating, home municipality (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Mullsjö
211.0 pointsLowest
Habo
229.0 pointsHighest
National (municipal mean)
218.3

Year 9 merit rating, municipality of location (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Mullsjö
203.9 pointsLowest
Habo
230.1 pointsHighest
National (municipal mean)
217.0
Data points (observation IDs)

Housing

Completed dwellings
2025 · dwellings

Mullsjö
10.0 dwellings
Habo
10.0 dwellings
National (municipal mean)
108.1

Rental dwellings, number per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Mullsjö
136.8 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Habo
71.3 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
171.6

Completed detached houses per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Mullsjö
1.3 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Habo
0.7 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.6

Apartment price, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Mullsjö
14,334 SEK/m²Lowest
Habo
20,329 SEK/m²Highest
National (municipal mean)
17,205

House prices, detached houses, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Mullsjö
15,923 SEK/m²Lowest
Habo
25,229 SEK/m²Highest
National (municipal mean)
21,704

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 3), share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
30.0 %Highest
Habo
30.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
36.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Health

Life expectancy, men
2025 · years

Mullsjö
82.1 yearsLowest
Habo
83.2 yearsHighest
National (municipal mean)
81.3

Residential elderly care users satisfied overall (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
72.7 %Lowest
Habo
87.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
78.1

Ongoing stress-related sick leave, annual average share of population (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
0.5 %Lowest
Habo
0.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
0.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Crime

Reported offences against liberty and peace (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
977.5 /100kHighest
Habo
956.7 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
1,418.9

Reported offences, total (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
6,657.9 /100kHighest
Habo
5,087.7 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
9,856.9

Reported economic crime (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
1,717.3 /100kHighest
Habo
1,705.8 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,075.2

Reported gross violation of a woman's integrity (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
0.0 /100k
Habo
0.0 /100k
National (municipal mean)
8.4

Reported drug offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
409.5 /100kHighest
Habo
215.1 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
825.5

Reported sexual offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
92.5 /100kLowest
Habo
163.2 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
187.2
Data points (observation IDs)

Politics

Assignments per elected municipal politician
2025 · assignments/politician

Mullsjö
2.0 assignments/politicianHighest
Habo
1.8 assignments/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
1.8

Residents per elected municipal politician
2025 · residents/politician

Mullsjö
93.8 residents/politicianLowest
Habo
138.7 residents/politicianHighest
National (municipal mean)
221.4

Elected municipal politicians part-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
0.0 %Lowest
Habo
2.1 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.5

Elected municipal politicians full-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
2.5 %Highest
Habo
1.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
1.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Calculated and specialised measures

The measures below are not official municipal observations in the same sense as the tables above. They are calculated by Sverigefakta or taken from situation reports and model estimates, and are therefore reported separately.

Estimated net cost per resident per year
Model estimate
Note: Model estimate = (received / 5) × Ruist's average annual net cost per person (SEK 74,000 in 2018 prices, inflation-adjusted) / population. It covers only the last five years of reception and is not official municipal accounting.

Mullsjö
-121 SEK
Habo
-127 SEK
National
About the data. The comparison uses the municipal engine's verified time series — the same figures, definitions and sources as the municipal pages. For every metric we use the latest period in which all selected municipalities have a verified value. If no common period exists the metric is omitted entirely; nothing is imputed and years are never mixed within a row.

About the tool

Compare municipalities — method, units and sources

Choose up to four municipalities and see them side by side on the same indicator, the same year and the same unit. The national mean is shown as a reference. Shareable URL — the recipient opens the same comparison.

Method & limitations

  • All compared municipalities are shown for the same year per indicator. Where an indicator is missing '—' is displayed.
  • Units are fixed per row (percent, SEK, count per 1,000). Rows never mix units within the same column.
  • The national mean is the source's own national row (SCB / Kolada / Migrationsverket) — not an average of municipalities.
  • Ranking or best/worst colours are only used where the indicator has a clear direction (e.g. upper-secondary eligibility, higher is better).
  • Net cost is a model estimate: Ruist's 74,000 SEK/year × arrivals 2020–2024 / population. Not official municipal accounts.
  • The clear button resets selections. URL parameters make the comparison shareable.

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

2

reports & studies

6

primary datasets

All primary sources

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Per capita / per 1,000 / per 100,000
Normalising an absolute number by population size, so municipalities of different sizes can be compared. Shootings, for example, are usually reported per 100,000 inhabitants.
Median vs mean
The median is the middle value in a sorted series. The mean is the sum divided by the count and is much more sensitive to outliers. Incomes and wealth are therefore usually reported as medians.
Ranking & percentile
The ranking is the municipality's place in the sorted list of all 290 municipalities. The percentile is the share below the municipality — rank 29 of 290 ≈ the 90th percentile.Ties use shared ranking (e.g. two municipalities both at rank 10).

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

No — we cap at four. Beyond that the table becomes hard to read on mobile and colour coding loses its meaning. Use /en/comparisons for county-vs-county perspectives.