Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Compare municipalities

Select up to four municipalities and compare verified key figures on population, work, economy and tax, schools, housing, health and crime. Every metric is compared for the same period across all selected municipalities — otherwise it is not shown.

Last updated: View changelog

MullsjöprofileAnebyprofile

Overview

Mullsjö
County: Jönköpings län
Population 2025: 7,539
Full municipal profile
Aneby
County: Jönköpings län
Population 2025: 6,821
Full municipal profile

Quick comparison

Sverigefakta does not rank municipalities as good or bad. “Highest” and “Lowest” describe only the numeric value among the selected municipalities.

Population (31 Dec)
2025 · people

Mullsjö
7,539.0 peopleHighest
Aneby
6,821.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 5 years
2025 · %

Mullsjö
2.1 %Highest
Aneby
0.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)

Municipal tax rate (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
22.3 %Highest
Aneby
22.1 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21.7

Median income, 20+
2024 · SEK

Mullsjö
347,400 SEKHighest
Aneby
345,600 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
345,416

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational upper secondary programmes (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
74.7 %Lowest
Aneby
91.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
81.5

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 2), share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
8.9 %Lowest
Aneby
14.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
13.5

Life expectancy, women
2025 · years

Mullsjö
84.1 yearsLowest
Aneby
84.6 yearsHighest
National (municipal mean)
84.7

Reported violent offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
435.9 /100kLowest
Aneby
1,025.8 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
885.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Population (31 Dec) over time

2002–2025 · people · Municipalities

Verified time series for the selected municipalities, same definition and same years.

Population (31 Dec) over time: Mullsjö moves from 7,124 (2002) to 7,539 (2025) — up 415 people. Full values are available in the data table below (2002–2025, Municipalities).

Population (31 Dec) over time · people · 2002–2025 · Municipalities
YearMullsjöAneby
2 0027 1246 631
2 0037 1296 666
2 0047 1016 624
2 0057 0876 576
2 0067 0756 551
2 0077 0466 506
2 0087 0866 523
2 0097 0276 446
2 0107 0336 393
2 0117 0346 415
2 0127 0706 407
2 0137 0396 375
2 0147 1096 426
2 0157 1576 537
2 0167 2266 603
2 0177 3286 776
2 0187 3246 832
2 0197 2906 848
2 0207 3856 821
2 0217 4306 892
2 0227 5326 824
2 0237 5776 852
2 0247 5946 797
2 0257 5396 821

Method: Only years where every selected municipality has a verified value are shown.

Source: SCB BE0101N1

Comparison by topic

Population

Annual population change
2025 · people

Mullsjö
-55.0 peopleLowest
Aneby
24.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 10 years
2025 · %

Mullsjö
5.3 %Highest
Aneby
4.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)

Residents aged 0–19, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
24.4 %Highest
Aneby
24.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
22.0

Residents aged 20–64, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
50.9 %Lowest
Aneby
51.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
52.6

Residents aged 65–79, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
17.1 %Lowest
Aneby
18.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
17.6

Residents aged 80+, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
7.5 %Highest
Aneby
6.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
7.8

Deaths, number
2025 · people

Mullsjö
79.0 peopleHighest
Aneby
69.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
318.1

Births, number
2025 · people

Mullsjö
65.0 peopleLowest
Aneby
69.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
336.2

Demographic dependency ratio
2025 · ratio

Mullsjö
0.96 ratioHighest
Aneby
0.95 ratioLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.91

In-migration to the municipality
2025 · people

Mullsjö
386.0 peopleHighest
Aneby
372.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,132.5

Net domestic migration
2025 · people

Mullsjö
-32.0 peopleLowest
Aneby
34.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.1

Out-migration from the municipality
2025 · people

Mullsjö
421.0 peopleHighest
Aneby
316.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,091.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Work

Residents receiving social assistance during the year, share of population (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
2.7 %Highest
Aneby
2.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
2.4

Households receiving social assistance, number
2025 · households

Mullsjö
133.0 householdsHighest
Aneby
108.0 householdsLowest
National (municipal mean)
522.6

Employment rate, foreign-born 20–64 (%)
2024 · %

Mullsjö
73.2 %Highest
Aneby
72.7 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
70.2

Residents aged 16–24 not in employment, education or training (%)
2024 · %

Mullsjö
6.1 %Highest
Aneby
5.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
6.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Economy & tax

Net cost of elderly care, SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Mullsjö
16,285 SEK/residentHighest
Aneby
15,363 SEK/residentLowest
National (municipal mean)
17,158

Net cost of social services (IFO), SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Mullsjö
4,721.4 SEK/residentLowest
Aneby
6,609.7 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
5,333.4

Net income as share of tax revenue & general grants (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
0.9 %Lowest
Aneby
3.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
3.5

Tax base per resident (SEK)
2025 · SEK

Mullsjö
262,403 SEKLowest
Aneby
265,910 SEKHighest
National (municipal mean)
280,284

Equity ratio, municipality (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
19.6 %Lowest
Aneby
44.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
40.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Schools

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational programmes, municipal schools (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
74.7 %Lowest
Aneby
93.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
80.8

Year 9 pupils passing all subjects (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
61.3 %Lowest
Aneby
84.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
67.9

Upper-secondary students graduating within 3 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
54.7 %Lowest
Aneby
72.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
69.3

Upper-secondary students graduating within 4 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
65.5 %Lowest
Aneby
79.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
73.5

Year 9 average merit rating, home municipality (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Mullsjö
211.0 pointsLowest
Aneby
236.0 pointsHighest
National (municipal mean)
218.3

Year 9 merit rating, municipality of location (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Mullsjö
203.9 pointsLowest
Aneby
223.6 pointsHighest
National (municipal mean)
217.0
Data points (observation IDs)

Housing

Completed dwellings
2025 · dwellings

Mullsjö
10.0 dwellingsHighest
Aneby
4.0 dwellingsLowest
National (municipal mean)
108.1

Rental dwellings, number per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Mullsjö
136.8 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Aneby
131.5 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
171.6

Completed detached houses per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Mullsjö
1.3 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Aneby
0.6 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.6

Apartment price, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Mullsjö
14,334 SEK/m²Highest
Aneby
5,780.0 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
17,205

House prices, detached houses, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Mullsjö
15,923 SEK/m²Highest
Aneby
14,674 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21,704

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 3), share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
30.0 %Lowest
Aneby
42.3 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
36.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Health

Life expectancy, men
2025 · years

Mullsjö
82.1 yearsLowest
Aneby
82.7 yearsHighest
National (municipal mean)
81.3

Residential elderly care users satisfied overall (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
72.7 %Highest
Aneby
65.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
78.1

Ongoing stress-related sick leave, annual average share of population (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
0.5 %Lowest
Aneby
0.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
0.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Crime

Reported offences against liberty and peace (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
977.5 /100kLowest
Aneby
1,318.9 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
1,418.9

Reported offences, total (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
6,657.9 /100kLowest
Aneby
7,752.1 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
9,856.9

Reported economic crime (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
1,717.3 /100kHighest
Aneby
1,553.3 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,075.2

Reported gross violation of a woman's integrity (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
0.0 /100kLowest
Aneby
29.3 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
8.4

Reported drug offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
409.5 /100kLowest
Aneby
600.8 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
825.5

Reported sexual offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Mullsjö
92.5 /100kLowest
Aneby
102.6 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
187.2
Data points (observation IDs)

Politics

Assignments per elected municipal politician
2025 · assignments/politician

Mullsjö
2.0 assignments/politicianHighest
Aneby
1.5 assignments/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
1.8

Residents per elected municipal politician
2025 · residents/politician

Mullsjö
93.8 residents/politicianHighest
Aneby
86.0 residents/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
221.4

Elected municipal politicians part-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
0.0 %Lowest
Aneby
2.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.5

Elected municipal politicians full-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Mullsjö
2.5 %Highest
Aneby
1.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
1.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Calculated and specialised measures

The measures below are not official municipal observations in the same sense as the tables above. They are calculated by Sverigefakta or taken from situation reports and model estimates, and are therefore reported separately.

Estimated net cost per resident per year
Model estimate
Note: Model estimate = (received / 5) × Ruist's average annual net cost per person (SEK 74,000 in 2018 prices, inflation-adjusted) / population. It covers only the last five years of reception and is not official municipal accounting.

Mullsjö
-121 SEK
Aneby
-74 SEK
National
About the data. The comparison uses the municipal engine's verified time series — the same figures, definitions and sources as the municipal pages. For every metric we use the latest period in which all selected municipalities have a verified value. If no common period exists the metric is omitted entirely; nothing is imputed and years are never mixed within a row.

About the tool

Compare municipalities — method, units and sources

Choose up to four municipalities and see them side by side on the same indicator, the same year and the same unit. The national mean is shown as a reference. Shareable URL — the recipient opens the same comparison.

Method & limitations

  • All compared municipalities are shown for the same year per indicator. Where an indicator is missing '—' is displayed.
  • Units are fixed per row (percent, SEK, count per 1,000). Rows never mix units within the same column.
  • The national mean is the source's own national row (SCB / Kolada / Migrationsverket) — not an average of municipalities.
  • Ranking or best/worst colours are only used where the indicator has a clear direction (e.g. upper-secondary eligibility, higher is better).
  • Net cost is a model estimate: Ruist's 74,000 SEK/year × arrivals 2020–2024 / population. Not official municipal accounts.
  • The clear button resets selections. URL parameters make the comparison shareable.

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

2

reports & studies

6

primary datasets

All primary sources

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Per capita / per 1,000 / per 100,000
Normalising an absolute number by population size, so municipalities of different sizes can be compared. Shootings, for example, are usually reported per 100,000 inhabitants.
Median vs mean
The median is the middle value in a sorted series. The mean is the sum divided by the count and is much more sensitive to outliers. Incomes and wealth are therefore usually reported as medians.
Ranking & percentile
The ranking is the municipality's place in the sorted list of all 290 municipalities. The percentile is the share below the municipality — rank 29 of 290 ≈ the 90th percentile.Ties use shared ranking (e.g. two municipalities both at rank 10).

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

No — we cap at four. Beyond that the table becomes hard to read on mobile and colour coding loses its meaning. Use /en/comparisons for county-vs-county perspectives.