Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Compare municipalities

Select up to four municipalities and compare verified key figures on population, work, economy and tax, schools, housing, health and crime. Every metric is compared for the same period across all selected municipalities — otherwise it is not shown.

Last updated: View changelog

KävlingeprofileHöörprofile

Overview

Kävlinge
County: Skåne län
Population 2025: 32,632
Full municipal profile
Höör
County: Skåne län
Population 2025: 17,664
Full municipal profile

Quick comparison

Sverigefakta does not rank municipalities as good or bad. “Highest” and “Lowest” describe only the numeric value among the selected municipalities.

Population (31 Dec)
2025 · people

Kävlinge
32,632 peopleHighest
Höör
17,664 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 5 years
2025 · %

Kävlinge
1.9 %Lowest
Höör
5.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)

Municipal tax rate (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
18.5 %Lowest
Höör
21.8 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
21.7

Median income, 20+
2024 · SEK

Kävlinge
397,500 SEKHighest
Höör
352,800 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
345,416

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational upper secondary programmes (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
89.8 %Highest
Höör
86.4 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
81.5

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 2), share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
14.2 %Highest
Höör
8.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
13.5

Life expectancy, women
2025 · years

Kävlinge
85.9 yearsHighest
Höör
84.6 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
84.7

Reported violent offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
586.5 /100kLowest
Höör
914.8 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
885.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Population (31 Dec) over time

2002–2025 · people · Municipalities

Verified time series for the selected municipalities, same definition and same years.

Population (31 Dec) over time: Kävlinge moves from 25,191 (2002) to 32,632 (2025) — up 7,441 people. Full values are available in the data table below (2002–2025, Municipalities).

Population (31 Dec) over time · people · 2002–2025 · Municipalities
YearKävlingeHöör
2 00225 19114 169
2 00325 53914 278
2 00426 02414 520
2 00526 70414 604
2 00627 36914 777
2 00727 74614 924
2 00828 25515 039
2 00928 63815 261
2 01029 01315 460
2 01129 26115 492
2 01229 42715 526
2 01329 60015 637
2 01429 80815 770
2 01530 10415 970
2 01630 53216 192
2 01730 95916 478
2 01831 49116 637
2 01931 70516 713
2 02032 02016 830
2 02132 34116 954
2 02232 47017 297
2 02332 43017 376
2 02432 47717 518
2 02532 63217 664

Method: Only years where every selected municipality has a verified value are shown.

Source: SCB BE0101N1

Comparison by topic

Population

Annual population change
2025 · people

Kävlinge
155.0 peopleHighest
Höör
146.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 10 years
2025 · %

Kävlinge
8.4 %Lowest
Höör
10.6 %Highest
National (municipal mean)

Residents aged 0–19, share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
26.6 %Highest
Höör
24.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
22.0

Residents aged 20–64, share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
54.2 %Highest
Höör
52.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
52.6

Residents aged 65–79, share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
12.9 %Lowest
Höör
15.9 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
17.6

Residents aged 80+, share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
6.3 %Lowest
Höör
6.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
7.8

Deaths, number
2025 · people

Kävlinge
264.0 peopleHighest
Höör
142.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
318.1

Births, number
2025 · people

Kävlinge
267.0 peopleHighest
Höör
159.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
336.2

Demographic dependency ratio
2025 · ratio

Kävlinge
0.84 ratioLowest
Höör
0.89 ratioHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.91

In-migration to the municipality
2025 · people

Kävlinge
1,788.0 peopleHighest
Höör
1,219.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,132.5

Net domestic migration
2025 · people

Kävlinge
166.0 peopleHighest
Höör
112.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.1

Out-migration from the municipality
2025 · people

Kävlinge
1,612.0 peopleHighest
Höör
1,070.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,091.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Work

Residents receiving social assistance during the year, share of population (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
1.3 %Lowest
Höör
1.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.4

Households receiving social assistance, number
2025 · households

Kävlinge
242.0 householdsHighest
Höör
158.0 householdsLowest
National (municipal mean)
522.6

Employment rate, foreign-born 20–64 (%)
2024 · %

Kävlinge
74.8 %Highest
Höör
72.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
70.2

Residents aged 16–24 not in employment, education or training (%)
2024 · %

Kävlinge
5.0 %Lowest
Höör
7.8 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
6.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Economy & tax

Net cost of elderly care, SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Kävlinge
9,413.4 SEK/residentLowest
Höör
13,597 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
17,158

Net cost of social services (IFO), SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Kävlinge
2,589.2 SEK/residentLowest
Höör
2,932.6 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
5,333.4

Net income as share of tax revenue & general grants (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
10.9 %Highest
Höör
7.8 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
3.5

Tax base per resident (SEK)
2025 · SEK

Kävlinge
328,281 SEKHighest
Höör
276,112 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
280,284

Equity ratio, municipality (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
47.3 %Highest
Höör
39.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
40.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Schools

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational programmes, municipal schools (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
88.4 %Highest
Höör
85.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
80.8

Year 9 pupils passing all subjects (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
81.7 %Highest
Höör
75.7 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
67.9

Upper-secondary students graduating within 3 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
76.7 %Lowest
Höör
77.6 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
69.3

Upper-secondary students graduating within 4 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
81.3 %Highest
Höör
74.5 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
73.5

Year 9 average merit rating, home municipality (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Kävlinge
243.0 pointsHighest
Höör
229.0 pointsLowest
National (municipal mean)
218.3

Year 9 merit rating, municipality of location (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Kävlinge
240.7 pointsHighest
Höör
226.9 pointsLowest
National (municipal mean)
217.0
Data points (observation IDs)

Housing

Completed dwellings
2025 · dwellings

Kävlinge
139.0 dwellingsHighest
Höör
124.0 dwellingsLowest
National (municipal mean)
108.1

Rental dwellings, number per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Kävlinge
122.7 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Höör
116.5 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
171.6

Completed detached houses per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Kävlinge
0.5 per 1,000 residentsLowest
Höör
1.5 per 1,000 residentsHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.6

Apartment price, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Kävlinge
24,554 SEK/m²Highest
Höör
19,425 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
17,205

House prices, detached houses, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Kävlinge
33,643 SEK/m²Highest
Höör
21,510 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21,704

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 3), share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
37.1 %Highest
Höör
28.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
36.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Health

Life expectancy, men
2025 · years

Kävlinge
82.5 yearsHighest
Höör
80.9 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
81.3

Residential elderly care users satisfied overall (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
79.7 %Highest
Höör
78.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
78.1

Ongoing stress-related sick leave, annual average share of population (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
0.4 %Lowest
Höör
0.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
0.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Crime

Reported offences against liberty and peace (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
1,173.0 /100kLowest
Höör
1,216.0 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
1,418.9

Reported offences, total (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
8,343.1 /100kLowest
Höör
9,506.2 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
9,856.9

Reported economic crime (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
2,361.4 /100kLowest
Höör
2,432.0 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
2,075.2

Reported gross violation of a woman's integrity (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
0.0 /100kLowest
Höör
17.0 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
8.4

Reported drug offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
580.4 /100kHighest
Höör
517.1 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
825.5

Reported sexual offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Kävlinge
162.7 /100kLowest
Höör
193.2 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
187.2
Data points (observation IDs)

Politics

Assignments per elected municipal politician
2025 · assignments/politician

Kävlinge
1.8 assignments/politicianLowest
Höör
2.0 assignments/politicianHighest
National (municipal mean)
1.8

Residents per elected municipal politician
2025 · residents/politician

Kävlinge
233.6 residents/politicianHighest
Höör
175.2 residents/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
221.4

Elected municipal politicians part-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
2.2 %Highest
Höör
0.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
2.5

Elected municipal politicians full-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Kävlinge
0.7 %Lowest
Höör
1.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
1.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Calculated and specialised measures

The measures below are not official municipal observations in the same sense as the tables above. They are calculated by Sverigefakta or taken from situation reports and model estimates, and are therefore reported separately.

Estimated net cost per resident per year
Model estimate
Note: Model estimate = (received / 5) × Ruist's average annual net cost per person (SEK 74,000 in 2018 prices, inflation-adjusted) / population. It covers only the last five years of reception and is not official municipal accounting.

Kävlinge
-157 SEK
Höör
-127 SEK
National
About the data. The comparison uses the municipal engine's verified time series — the same figures, definitions and sources as the municipal pages. For every metric we use the latest period in which all selected municipalities have a verified value. If no common period exists the metric is omitted entirely; nothing is imputed and years are never mixed within a row.

About the tool

Compare municipalities — method, units and sources

Choose up to four municipalities and see them side by side on the same indicator, the same year and the same unit. The national mean is shown as a reference. Shareable URL — the recipient opens the same comparison.

Method & limitations

  • All compared municipalities are shown for the same year per indicator. Where an indicator is missing '—' is displayed.
  • Units are fixed per row (percent, SEK, count per 1,000). Rows never mix units within the same column.
  • The national mean is the source's own national row (SCB / Kolada / Migrationsverket) — not an average of municipalities.
  • Ranking or best/worst colours are only used where the indicator has a clear direction (e.g. upper-secondary eligibility, higher is better).
  • Net cost is a model estimate: Ruist's 74,000 SEK/year × arrivals 2020–2024 / population. Not official municipal accounts.
  • The clear button resets selections. URL parameters make the comparison shareable.

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

2

reports & studies

6

primary datasets

All primary sources

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Per capita / per 1,000 / per 100,000
Normalising an absolute number by population size, so municipalities of different sizes can be compared. Shootings, for example, are usually reported per 100,000 inhabitants.
Median vs mean
The median is the middle value in a sorted series. The mean is the sum divided by the count and is much more sensitive to outliers. Incomes and wealth are therefore usually reported as medians.
Ranking & percentile
The ranking is the municipality's place in the sorted list of all 290 municipalities. The percentile is the share below the municipality — rank 29 of 290 ≈ the 90th percentile.Ties use shared ranking (e.g. two municipalities both at rank 10).

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

No — we cap at four. Beyond that the table becomes hard to read on mobile and colour coding loses its meaning. Use /en/comparisons for county-vs-county perspectives.