Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Compare municipalities

Select up to four municipalities and compare verified key figures on population, work, economy and tax, schools, housing, health and crime. Every metric is compared for the same period across all selected municipalities — otherwise it is not shown.

Last updated: View changelog

HaboprofileTidaholmprofile

Overview

Habo
County: Jönköpings län
Population 2025: 13,516
Full municipal profile
Tidaholm
County: Västra Götalands län
Population 2025: 12,753
Full municipal profile

Quick comparison

Sverigefakta does not rank municipalities as good or bad. “Highest” and “Lowest” describe only the numeric value among the selected municipalities.

Population (31 Dec)
2025 · people

Habo
13,516 peopleHighest
Tidaholm
12,753 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 5 years
2025 · %

Habo
7.4 %Highest
Tidaholm
-0.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)

Municipal tax rate (%)
2025 · %

Habo
22.2 %Highest
Tidaholm
22.1 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21.7

Median income, 20+
2024 · SEK

Habo
385,500 SEKHighest
Tidaholm
338,500 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
345,416

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational upper secondary programmes (%)
2025 · %

Habo
82.0 %Highest
Tidaholm
78.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
81.5

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 2), share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
11.3 %Highest
Tidaholm
6.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
13.5

Life expectancy, women
2025 · years

Habo
87.3 yearsHighest
Tidaholm
85.2 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
84.7

Reported violent offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
378.2 /100kLowest
Tidaholm
736.1 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
885.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Population (31 Dec) over time

2002–2025 · people · Municipalities

Verified time series for the selected municipalities, same definition and same years.

Population (31 Dec) over time: Habo moves from 9,584 (2002) to 13,516 (2025) — up 3,932 people. Full values are available in the data table below (2002–2025, Municipalities).

Population (31 Dec) over time · people · 2002–2025 · Municipalities
YearHaboTidaholm
2 0029 58412 585
2 0039 56812 575
2 0049 75812 543
2 0059 84212 535
2 00610 12212 653
2 00710 37512 651
2 00810 52612 693
2 00910 67412 632
2 01010 74112 572
2 01110 82812 569
2 01210 87912 556
2 01310 97512 565
2 01411 11012 617
2 01511 31412 669
2 01611 58612 797
2 01711 84512 827
2 01812 14012 828
2 01912 43312 846
2 02012 58912 790
2 02112 81012 825
2 02213 12812 839
2 02313 27512 839
2 02413 45612 805
2 02513 51612 753

Method: Only years where every selected municipality has a verified value are shown.

Source: SCB BE0101N1

Comparison by topic

Population

Annual population change
2025 · people

Habo
60.0 peopleHighest
Tidaholm
-52.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 10 years
2025 · %

Habo
19.5 %Highest
Tidaholm
0.7 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)

Residents aged 0–19, share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
29.9 %Highest
Tidaholm
22.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
22.0

Residents aged 20–64, share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
51.5 %Lowest
Tidaholm
52.6 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
52.6

Residents aged 65–79, share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
13.0 %Lowest
Tidaholm
17.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
17.6

Residents aged 80+, share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
5.6 %Lowest
Tidaholm
8.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
7.8

Deaths, number
2025 · people

Habo
92.0 peopleLowest
Tidaholm
140.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
318.1

Births, number
2025 · people

Habo
135.0 peopleHighest
Tidaholm
125.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
336.2

Demographic dependency ratio
2025 · ratio

Habo
0.94 ratioHighest
Tidaholm
0.90 ratioLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.91

In-migration to the municipality
2025 · people

Habo
547.0 peopleHighest
Tidaholm
467.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,132.5

Net domestic migration
2025 · people

Habo
17.0 peopleHighest
Tidaholm
-65.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.1

Out-migration from the municipality
2025 · people

Habo
540.0 peopleHighest
Tidaholm
514.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,091.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Work

Residents receiving social assistance during the year, share of population (%)
2025 · %

Habo
1.3 %Lowest
Tidaholm
2.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.4

Employed refugees/family reunified 20–64, 4–6 years of residence, share (%)
2023 · %

Habo
68.6 %Highest
Tidaholm
60.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
61.1

Households receiving social assistance, number
2025 · households

Habo
97.0 householdsLowest
Tidaholm
178.0 householdsHighest
National (municipal mean)
522.6

Employment rate, foreign-born 20–64 (%)
2024 · %

Habo
74.3 %Highest
Tidaholm
72.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
70.2

Residents aged 16–24 not in employment, education or training (%)
2024 · %

Habo
5.5 %Lowest
Tidaholm
7.8 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
6.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Economy & tax

Net cost of elderly care, SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Habo
11,340 SEK/residentLowest
Tidaholm
16,133 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
17,158

Net cost of social services (IFO), SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Habo
2,725.6 SEK/residentLowest
Tidaholm
4,143.5 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
5,333.4

Net income as share of tax revenue & general grants (%)
2025 · %

Habo
4.8 %Lowest
Tidaholm
5.3 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
3.5

Tax base per resident (SEK)
2025 · SEK

Habo
279,235 SEKHighest
Tidaholm
266,559 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
280,284

Equity ratio, municipality (%)
2025 · %

Habo
47.5 %Lowest
Tidaholm
55.8 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
40.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Schools

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational programmes, municipal schools (%)
2025 · %

Habo
82.0 %Highest
Tidaholm
78.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
80.8

Year 9 pupils passing all subjects (%)
2025 · %

Habo
71.5 %Highest
Tidaholm
60.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
67.9

Upper-secondary students graduating within 3 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Habo
76.5 %Highest
Tidaholm
69.7 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
69.3

Upper-secondary students graduating within 4 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Habo
78.5 %Highest
Tidaholm
69.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
73.5

Year 9 average merit rating, home municipality (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Habo
229.0 pointsHighest
Tidaholm
207.0 pointsLowest
National (municipal mean)
218.3

Year 9 merit rating, municipality of location (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Habo
230.1 pointsHighest
Tidaholm
208.0 pointsLowest
National (municipal mean)
217.0
Data points (observation IDs)

Housing

Completed dwellings
2025 · dwellings

Habo
10.0 dwellings
Tidaholm
10.0 dwellings
National (municipal mean)
108.1

Rental dwellings, number per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Habo
71.3 per 1,000 residentsLowest
Tidaholm
133.8 per 1,000 residentsHighest
National (municipal mean)
171.6

Completed detached houses per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Habo
0.7 per 1,000 residentsLowest
Tidaholm
0.8 per 1,000 residentsHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.6

Apartment price, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Habo
20,329 SEK/m²Highest
Tidaholm
4,707.0 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
17,205

House prices, detached houses, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Habo
25,229 SEK/m²Highest
Tidaholm
14,454 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
21,704

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 3), share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
30.0 %Highest
Tidaholm
25.5 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
36.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Health

Life expectancy, men
2025 · years

Habo
83.2 yearsHighest
Tidaholm
80.8 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
81.3

Residential elderly care users satisfied overall (%)
2025 · %

Habo
87.0 %Highest
Tidaholm
82.5 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
78.1

Ongoing stress-related sick leave, annual average share of population (%)
2025 · %

Habo
0.7 %Highest
Tidaholm
0.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
0.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Crime

Reported offences against liberty and peace (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
956.7 /100kLowest
Tidaholm
1,002.3 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
1,418.9

Reported offences, total (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
5,087.7 /100kLowest
Tidaholm
7,493.8 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
9,856.9

Reported economic crime (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
1,705.8 /100kHighest
Tidaholm
1,613.1 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,075.2

Reported gross violation of a woman's integrity (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
0.0 /100k
Tidaholm
0.0 /100k
National (municipal mean)
8.4

Reported drug offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
215.1 /100kLowest
Tidaholm
532.5 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
825.5

Reported sexual offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Habo
163.2 /100kHighest
Tidaholm
148.8 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
187.2
Data points (observation IDs)

Politics

Assignments per elected municipal politician
2025 · assignments/politician

Habo
1.8 assignments/politicianHighest
Tidaholm
1.7 assignments/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
1.8

Residents per elected municipal politician
2025 · residents/politician

Habo
138.7 residents/politicianHighest
Tidaholm
125.5 residents/politicianLowest
National (municipal mean)
221.4

Elected municipal politicians part-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
2.1 %Highest
Tidaholm
0.0 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
2.5

Elected municipal politicians full-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Habo
1.0 %Lowest
Tidaholm
2.0 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
1.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Calculated and specialised measures

The measures below are not official municipal observations in the same sense as the tables above. They are calculated by Sverigefakta or taken from situation reports and model estimates, and are therefore reported separately.

Estimated net cost per resident per year
Model estimate
Note: Model estimate = (received / 5) × Ruist's average annual net cost per person (SEK 74,000 in 2018 prices, inflation-adjusted) / population. It covers only the last five years of reception and is not official municipal accounting.

Habo
-127 SEK
Tidaholm
-62 SEK
National
About the data. The comparison uses the municipal engine's verified time series — the same figures, definitions and sources as the municipal pages. For every metric we use the latest period in which all selected municipalities have a verified value. If no common period exists the metric is omitted entirely; nothing is imputed and years are never mixed within a row.

About the tool

Compare municipalities — method, units and sources

Choose up to four municipalities and see them side by side on the same indicator, the same year and the same unit. The national mean is shown as a reference. Shareable URL — the recipient opens the same comparison.

Method & limitations

  • All compared municipalities are shown for the same year per indicator. Where an indicator is missing '—' is displayed.
  • Units are fixed per row (percent, SEK, count per 1,000). Rows never mix units within the same column.
  • The national mean is the source's own national row (SCB / Kolada / Migrationsverket) — not an average of municipalities.
  • Ranking or best/worst colours are only used where the indicator has a clear direction (e.g. upper-secondary eligibility, higher is better).
  • Net cost is a model estimate: Ruist's 74,000 SEK/year × arrivals 2020–2024 / population. Not official municipal accounts.
  • The clear button resets selections. URL parameters make the comparison shareable.

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

2

reports & studies

6

primary datasets

All primary sources

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Per capita / per 1,000 / per 100,000
Normalising an absolute number by population size, so municipalities of different sizes can be compared. Shootings, for example, are usually reported per 100,000 inhabitants.
Median vs mean
The median is the middle value in a sorted series. The mean is the sum divided by the count and is much more sensitive to outliers. Incomes and wealth are therefore usually reported as medians.
Ranking & percentile
The ranking is the municipality's place in the sorted list of all 290 municipalities. The percentile is the share below the municipality — rank 29 of 290 ≈ the 90th percentile.Ties use shared ranking (e.g. two municipalities both at rank 10).

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

No — we cap at four. Beyond that the table becomes hard to read on mobile and colour coding loses its meaning. Use /en/comparisons for county-vs-county perspectives.