Skip to content
SVERIGEFAKTA

Compare municipalities

Select up to four municipalities and compare verified key figures on population, work, economy and tax, schools, housing, health and crime. Every metric is compared for the same period across all selected municipalities — otherwise it is not shown.

Last updated: View changelog

ÅngeprofileBräckeprofile

Overview

Ånge
County: Västernorrlands län
Population 2025: 9,018
Full municipal profile
Bräcke
County: Jämtlands län
Population 2025: 5,915
Full municipal profile

Quick comparison

Sverigefakta does not rank municipalities as good or bad. “Highest” and “Lowest” describe only the numeric value among the selected municipalities.

Population (31 Dec)
2025 · people

Ånge
9,018.0 peopleHighest
Bräcke
5,915.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 5 years
2025 · %

Ånge
-2.3 %Highest
Bräcke
-4.3 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)

Municipal tax rate (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
23.3 %Lowest
Bräcke
23.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
21.7

Median income, 20+
2024 · SEK

Ånge
322,600 SEKHighest
Bräcke
307,800 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
345,416

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational upper secondary programmes (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
70.5 %Lowest
Bräcke
85.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
81.5

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 2), share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
8.2 %Lowest
Bräcke
12.2 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
13.5

Life expectancy, women
2025 · years

Ånge
82.9 yearsLowest
Bräcke
85.3 yearsHighest
National (municipal mean)
84.7

Reported violent offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
1,341.2 /100kHighest
Bräcke
1,068.0 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
885.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Population (31 Dec) over time

2002–2025 · people · Municipalities

Verified time series for the selected municipalities, same definition and same years.

Population (31 Dec) over time: Ånge moves from 10,948 (2002) to 9,018 (2025) — down 1,930 people. Full values are available in the data table below (2002–2025, Municipalities).

Population (31 Dec) over time · people · 2002–2025 · Municipalities
YearÅngeBräcke
2 00210 9487 406
2 00310 8977 359
2 00410 8217 282
2 00510 6927 192
2 00610 6047 202
2 00710 4427 109
2 00810 3237 009
2 00910 1486 865
2 01010 0536 885
2 0119 8396 750
2 0129 6396 655
2 0139 5486 559
2 0149 4846 463
2 0159 4936 455
2 0169 4956 492
2 0179 4806 501
2 0189 4116 376
2 0199 3166 298
2 0209 2266 181
2 0219 2336 175
2 0229 1436 162
2 0239 1096 099
2 0249 0446 035
2 0259 0185 915

Method: Only years where every selected municipality has a verified value are shown.

Source: SCB BE0101N1

Comparison by topic

Population

Annual population change
2025 · people

Ånge
-26.0 peopleHighest
Bräcke
-120.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)

Population change, 10 years
2025 · %

Ånge
-5.0 %Highest
Bräcke
-8.4 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)

Residents aged 0–19, share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
18.9 %Highest
Bräcke
18.6 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
22.0

Residents aged 20–64, share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
50.9 %Highest
Bräcke
50.1 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
52.6

Residents aged 65–79, share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
21.7 %Lowest
Bräcke
22.1 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
17.6

Residents aged 80+, share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
8.5 %Lowest
Bräcke
9.1 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
7.8

Deaths, number
2025 · people

Ånge
102.0 peopleHighest
Bräcke
100.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
318.1

Births, number
2025 · people

Ånge
58.0 peopleHighest
Bräcke
26.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
336.2

Demographic dependency ratio
2025 · ratio

Ånge
0.97 ratioLowest
Bräcke
1.00 ratioHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.91

In-migration to the municipality
2025 · people

Ånge
352.0 peopleHighest
Bräcke
312.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,132.5

Net domestic migration
2025 · people

Ånge
-55.0 peopleLowest
Bräcke
-32.0 peopleHighest
National (municipal mean)
0.1

Out-migration from the municipality
2025 · people

Ånge
359.0 peopleHighest
Bräcke
323.0 peopleLowest
National (municipal mean)
2,091.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Work

Residents receiving social assistance during the year, share of population (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
1.8 %Lowest
Bräcke
3.1 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.4

Employed refugees/family reunified 20–64, 4–6 years of residence, share (%)
2023 · %

Ånge
61.5 %Lowest
Bräcke
73.9 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
61.1

Households receiving social assistance, number
2025 · households

Ånge
133.0 householdsHighest
Bräcke
110.0 householdsLowest
National (municipal mean)
522.6

Employment rate, foreign-born 20–64 (%)
2024 · %

Ånge
65.8 %Lowest
Bräcke
68.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
70.2

Residents aged 16–24 not in employment, education or training (%)
2024 · %

Ånge
8.2 %Highest
Bräcke
7.9 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
6.9
Data points (observation IDs)

Economy & tax

Net cost of elderly care, SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Ånge
23,287 SEK/residentLowest
Bräcke
26,979 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
17,158

Net cost of social services (IFO), SEK per resident
2025 · SEK/resident

Ånge
4,758.2 SEK/residentLowest
Bräcke
6,083.0 SEK/residentHighest
National (municipal mean)
5,333.4

Net income as share of tax revenue & general grants (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
-0.0 %Highest
Bräcke
-3.1 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
3.5

Tax base per resident (SEK)
2025 · SEK

Ånge
265,895 SEKHighest
Bräcke
248,895 SEKLowest
National (municipal mean)
280,284

Equity ratio, municipality (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
33.0 %Highest
Bräcke
-6.2 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
40.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Schools

Year 9 pupils eligible for vocational programmes, municipal schools (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
68.5 %Lowest
Bräcke
85.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
80.8

Year 9 pupils passing all subjects (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
66.7 %Lowest
Bräcke
77.4 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
67.9

Upper-secondary students graduating within 3 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
55.3 %Lowest
Bräcke
67.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
69.3

Upper-secondary students graduating within 4 years, home municipality (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
61.9 %Lowest
Bräcke
69.9 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
73.5

Year 9 average merit rating, home municipality (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Ånge
191.0 pointsLowest
Bräcke
220.0 pointsHighest
National (municipal mean)
218.3

Year 9 merit rating, municipality of location (17 subjects)
2025 · points

Ånge
189.0 pointsLowest
Bräcke
220.2 pointsHighest
National (municipal mean)
217.0
Data points (observation IDs)

Housing

Completed dwellings
2025 · dwellings

Ånge
3.0 dwellingsHighest
Bräcke
1.0 dwellingsLowest
National (municipal mean)
108.1

Rental dwellings, number per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Ånge
184.4 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Bräcke
167.6 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
171.6

Completed detached houses per 1,000 residents
2025 · per 1,000 residents

Ånge
0.3 per 1,000 residentsHighest
Bräcke
0.2 per 1,000 residentsLowest
National (municipal mean)
0.6

Apartment price, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Ånge
1,527.0 SEK/m²Highest
Bräcke
803.0 SEK/m²Lowest
National (municipal mean)
17,205

House prices, detached houses, SEK/m²
2025 · SEK/m²

Ånge
6,372.0 SEK/m²Lowest
Bräcke
8,558.0 SEK/m²Highest
National (municipal mean)
21,704

Overcrowding in apartment blocks (norm 3), share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
28.4 %Lowest
Bräcke
41.3 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
36.4
Data points (observation IDs)

Health

Life expectancy, men
2025 · years

Ånge
80.1 yearsHighest
Bräcke
79.7 yearsLowest
National (municipal mean)
81.3

Residential elderly care users satisfied overall (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
72.0 %Lowest
Bräcke
76.9 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
78.1

Ongoing stress-related sick leave, annual average share of population (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
0.4 %Lowest
Bräcke
0.7 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
0.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Crime

Reported offences against liberty and peace (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
1,485.3 /100kLowest
Bräcke
1,818.9 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
1,418.9

Reported offences, total (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
9,310.6 /100kLowest
Bräcke
11,948 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
9,856.9

Reported economic crime (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
1,795.6 /100kLowest
Bräcke
2,219.4 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
2,075.2

Reported gross violation of a woman's integrity (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
0.0 /100kLowest
Bräcke
16.7 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
8.4

Reported drug offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
376.9 /100kLowest
Bräcke
600.8 /100kHighest
National (municipal mean)
825.5

Reported sexual offences (per 100,000)
2025 · /100k

Ånge
432.3 /100kHighest
Bräcke
183.6 /100kLowest
National (municipal mean)
187.2
Data points (observation IDs)

Politics

Assignments per elected municipal politician
2025 · assignments/politician

Ånge
1.5 assignments/politicianLowest
Bräcke
1.8 assignments/politicianHighest
National (municipal mean)
1.8

Residents per elected municipal politician
2025 · residents/politician

Ånge
107.7 residents/politicianLowest
Bräcke
109.7 residents/politicianHighest
National (municipal mean)
221.4

Elected municipal politicians part-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
0.0 %Lowest
Bräcke
5.5 %Highest
National (municipal mean)
2.5

Elected municipal politicians full-time, share (%)
2025 · %

Ånge
2.4 %Highest
Bräcke
1.8 %Lowest
National (municipal mean)
1.5
Data points (observation IDs)

Calculated and specialised measures

The measures below are not official municipal observations in the same sense as the tables above. They are calculated by Sverigefakta or taken from situation reports and model estimates, and are therefore reported separately.

Estimated net cost per resident per year
Model estimate
Note: Model estimate = (received / 5) × Ruist's average annual net cost per person (SEK 74,000 in 2018 prices, inflation-adjusted) / population. It covers only the last five years of reception and is not official municipal accounting.

Ånge
-243 SEK
Bräcke
-81 SEK
National
About the data. The comparison uses the municipal engine's verified time series — the same figures, definitions and sources as the municipal pages. For every metric we use the latest period in which all selected municipalities have a verified value. If no common period exists the metric is omitted entirely; nothing is imputed and years are never mixed within a row.

About the tool

Compare municipalities — method, units and sources

Choose up to four municipalities and see them side by side on the same indicator, the same year and the same unit. The national mean is shown as a reference. Shareable URL — the recipient opens the same comparison.

Method & limitations

  • All compared municipalities are shown for the same year per indicator. Where an indicator is missing '—' is displayed.
  • Units are fixed per row (percent, SEK, count per 1,000). Rows never mix units within the same column.
  • The national mean is the source's own national row (SCB / Kolada / Migrationsverket) — not an average of municipalities.
  • Ranking or best/worst colours are only used where the indicator has a clear direction (e.g. upper-secondary eligibility, higher is better).
  • Net cost is a model estimate: Ruist's 74,000 SEK/year × arrivals 2020–2024 / population. Not official municipal accounts.
  • The clear button resets selections. URL parameters make the comparison shareable.

Primary sources

Agencies and research institutions behind this page

4

agencies/institutions

2

reports & studies

6

primary datasets

All primary sources

Definitions

How the numbers are counted — and what they do not cover

Per capita / per 1,000 / per 100,000
Normalising an absolute number by population size, so municipalities of different sizes can be compared. Shootings, for example, are usually reported per 100,000 inhabitants.
Median vs mean
The median is the middle value in a sorted series. The mean is the sum divided by the count and is much more sensitive to outliers. Incomes and wealth are therefore usually reported as medians.
Ranking & percentile
The ranking is the municipality's place in the sorted list of all 290 municipalities. The percentile is the share below the municipality — rank 29 of 290 ≈ the 90th percentile.Ties use shared ranking (e.g. two municipalities both at rank 10).

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to what is most often discussed

No — we cap at four. Beyond that the table becomes hard to read on mobile and colour coding loses its meaning. Use /en/comparisons for county-vs-county perspectives.